IPC vs BNS 2023 Complete Section Comparison Guide

IPC vs BNS 2023 Complete Section Comparison Guide

BNS vs IPC 2023: Complete Section Comparison Guide for Judiciary Exam

If you ever searched “BNS 302” expecting murder (like IPC 302) and got confused, this guide is written exactly for you.

1. Introduction: Why This Topic is Now Non‑Negotiable for Judiciary Aspirants

Until a few years ago, every judiciary aspirant studied the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) as the core of criminal law. However, with the enforcement of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) from 1 July 2024, the entire framework of substantive criminal law has been replaced.

Your judiciary exam will now test you primarily on BNS, not on IPC. But:

  • Most case law and older questions still use IPC section numbers.
  • Many teachers and notes still refer to IPC sections out of habit.
  • Students repeatedly get stuck on questions like:
    • “Is BNS 302 still murder?”
    • “What is the new number of IPC 300/302/320?”
    • “What exactly changed in hurt, grievous hurt, rape and cybercrime?”

This blog is designed as a complete conceptual and practical guide to BNS vs IPC for judiciary exams. It will:

  • Explain why section numbers changed instead of just giving a dry mapping table.
  • Cover murder, culpable homicide, hurt, grievous hurt, rape, theft, cybercrime, mob lynching etc. with IPC & BNS comparison.
  • Answer the most frequently asked questions that judiciary students have.
  • Give you MCQs with detailed explanations to test yourself immediately.

2. Big Picture: Why IPC Was Replaced and What BNS Tries to Fix

2.1 IPC: A 19th Century Law in a 21st Century Country

IPC was drafted in the mid‑19th century by Lord Macaulay and came into force in 1860. It served India for more than 160 years, but it was:

  • Written in colonial, archaic English.
  • Silent or weak on modern crimes: cybercrime, data theft, online harassment, terrorism in its modern form.
  • Carrying provisions that reflected colonial priorities, not a sovereign republic:
    • Section 124A (sedition) – widely criticized and misused.
    • Section 377 – used to criminalise consensual homosexual acts (read down by Supreme Court).

2.2 BNS 2023: Objectives and Philosophy

BNS 2023 aims to:

  • Modernise criminal law to deal with digital and organized crime.
  • Streamline and consolidate provisions (511 sections in IPC → 358 sections in BNS).
  • Simplify language to make statutes more accessible to citizens, police, and judges.
  • Victim‑centric orientation: stronger focus on victims’ rights and speedy justice.
  • Remove or narrow colonial provisions like sedition and unnatural offences.
Key idea: BNS is not just “IPC with new numbers”. It is a logical re‑organisation, consolidation, and modernisation of criminal law.

3. Structural Changes: From IPC 511 Sections to BNS 358 Sections


AspectIPC 1860BNS 2023
Total Sections511358
LanguageArchaic, colonialSimplified, modern, more gender‑neutral
Digital & Organized CrimeScattered / inadequateDedicated provisions (cybercrime, organized crime, terrorism)
Conceptual StructureSometimes scattered logicallyRe‑grouped by coherent crime categories
Colonial ProvisionsIncluded (e.g., sedition)Removed or reframed (e.g., sovereignty offences)

BNS reorganises offences chapter‑wise more coherently. For example, offences affecting the human body, sexual offences, offences against property, and offences against the state are grouped with more clarity.

4. The Biggest Confusion: IPC 302 vs BNS 302

Memorise this now: Murder is no longer Section 302 in the new code. IPC 302 ≠ BNS 302.


4.1 What Was IPC Section 302?

IPC Section 302: Punishment for murder Whoever commits murder shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

For decades, “302” became synonymous with murder in public discourse.

4.2 What Is BNS Section 302 Now?

BNS Section 302: Uttering words, etc., with deliberate intent to wound religious feelings Whoever, with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of any person, utters any word or makes any sound in the hearing of that person or makes any gesture in the sight of that person or places any object in the sight of that person shall be punished with imprisonment up to one year, or with fine, or with both.

This roughly corresponds to IPC Section 298, not IPC 302. BNS has completely re‑numbered and re‑arranged the code.

4.3 Where Did Murder Go in BNS?


ConceptIPC SectionBNS Section
Definition of MurderSection 300Section 101
Definition of Culpable HomicideSection 299Section 100
Punishment for MurderSection 302Section 103

So, in exam terms:

  • “IPC 302” (murder) ≈ “BNS 103” (murder), not BNS 302.
  • BNS 302 is a much less serious offence about wounding religious feelings.

5. Murder, Culpable Homicide & Death‑Related Offences: IPC vs BNS

5.1 Conceptual Backbone: Murder vs Culpable Homicide

In both IPC and BNS, the core conceptual difference between murder and culpable homicide remains the same:

  • Murder – strong intention to cause death or such bodily injury that the offender knows is likely to cause death.
  • Culpable homicide – death is caused but without the degree of intention/knowledge that makes it murder.

5.2 Comparison Table – Murder & Culpable Homicide

OffenceIPCBNSKey Points
Definition of MurderSec. 300Sec. 101Definitions conceptually similar, language modernised.
Definition of Culpable HomicideSec. 299Sec. 100Similar concept – causing death with certain intention/knowledge.
Punishment for MurderSec. 302Sec. 103Death or life imprisonment + fine. BNS adds a mob lynching clause.
Causing Death by NegligenceSec. 304ASec. 106Rash or negligent act causing death.
Attempt to MurderSec. 307Sec. 109Attempt with intention or knowledge to cause death.

5.3 New & Important: Mob Lynching Under BNS 103(2)

BNS explicitly recognises mob lynching as an aggravated form of murder. Under BNS 103(2), when five or more persons acting as a group commit murder on grounds like caste, religion, language, sex, place of birth or personal belief, each is liable to death or life imprisonment and fine.

Under IPC, mob lynching was prosecuted under ordinary murder provisions without special emphasis on the group‑hate dimension.

6. Hurt & Grievous Hurt: 8 Types You Must Master


Exam reality: Almost every serious judiciary exam asks at least one question on “hurt vs grievous hurt” and the 8 types of grievous hurt.

6.1 Definitions: IPC vs BNS

ConceptIPCBNSEssence
Hurt – DefinitionSec. 319Sec. 111 (definition incorporated)Causing bodily pain, disease, or infirmity.
Grievous Hurt – DefinitionSec. 320Sec. 112 (8 types retained)Serious forms of hurt. Same 8 categories conceptually.
Voluntarily Causing HurtSec. 323Sec. 115Intentionally causing hurt.
Voluntarily Causing Grievous HurtSec. 325Sec. 117Intentionally causing grievous hurt – punishment enhanced.
Grievous Hurt by Dangerous WeaponSec. 326Sec. 118Weapon, fire, poison, corrosive substances etc.

6.2 The 8 Types of Grievous Hurt (BNS 112 – Conceptual Carry‑Forward of IPC 320)

#Type of Grievous HurtIllustration
1EmasculationCausing permanent impotence to a male.
2Permanent loss of sight of either eyeBlinding someone in one or both eyes permanently.
3Permanent loss of hearing of either earCausing complete deafness in one or both ears.
4Loss of any limb or jointAmputation of an arm, leg, finger, or toe.
5Permanent impairment of limb/jointParalysis or permanent weakening of a limb or joint.
6Permanent disfiguration of head or faceDeep scar on face due to knife or acid.
7Fracture or dislocation of a bone or toothBreaking a person’s arm, dislocating the shoulder.
8Any hurt which endangers life or causes the victim to be in severe bodily pain or unable to follow ordinary pursuits for 20 daysInjury leading to hospitalization/bed rest for 20+ days.

6.3 Simple Hurt vs Grievous Hurt – Quick Distinction


FactorSimple Hurt (BNS 115)Grievous Hurt (BNS 117)
NatureMinor, temporary pain or discomfortSerious, long‑lasting, or permanent injury
ExamplesSlap, minor bruise, ordinary swellingFracture, loss of eye, permanent scarring, 20+ days in pain
Exam TestNo match with 8 grievous types, no 20+ day effectFits any of the 8 grievous types
PunishmentUp to 3 months or fine (indicative)Up to 7–10 years, higher if with weapon

7. Sexual Offences: IPC vs BNS (Rape and Related Offences)


7.1 Rape: IPC 375/376 vs BNS 63/64

AspectIPCBNSKey Change
Definition of RapeSec. 375Sec. 63Concept largely preserved with age of consent clarified.
Punishment for RapeSec. 376Sec. 64Punishments retained; some clarifications/enhancements.
Age of ConsentEffectively 15 (later interpreted as higher)Explicitly 18Clear statutory protection for minors under 18.
Digital/Online HarassmentCovered indirectly, not explicitExplicitly covered via sexual harassment & cyber provisionsModernized to include online offences.

7.2 Sexual Harassment, Stalking, Voyeurism


OffenceIPCBNSExam Focus
Sexual HarassmentSec. 354ASec. 69Includes physical, verbal and online/virtual harassment.
VoyeurismSec. 354CSec. 71Includes recording/ sharing images/videos without consent.
StalkingSec. 354DSec. 72Now explicitly covers cyberstalking, social media following etc.

8. Property Offences: Theft, Robbery, Cheating


OffenceIPCBNSNotes
TheftSec. 378Sec. 303Definition preserved; can cover digital property more clearly.
RobberySec. 390–392Sec. 304–306Elements similar; punishments aligned with gravity.
Cheating (e.g., IPC 420)Sec. 415, 420Sec. 345, related provisionsNow integrated with electronic/online cheating possibilities.

9. Entirely New or Significantly Modernised Provisions in BNS

These provisions either did not exist in IPC or existed in a rudimentary form.

New/Modernised OffenceBNS SectionWhy Important
CybercrimeSec. 105 and relatedClear recognition of hacking, identity theft, online fraud, data theft.
Organised CrimeSec. 111Targeting syndicates, gangs, repeat networks.
Terrorist ActsSec. 113Responds to modern terrorism, similar to earlier special laws.
Mob LynchingSec. 103(2)Specific focus on group killings motivated by hatred (caste, religion, etc.).
Acid AttacksSec. 118–119 (in structure of BNS)Recognises acid attack as a distinct, heinous offence with severe punishment.
Offences Endangering SovereigntySec. 152Narrows and replaces broad sedition (IPC 124A) with focus on sovereignty and integrity.

 

10. Quick Reference: Important IPC → BNS Section Conversions

OffenceIPC SectionBNS Section
Definition of Murder300101
Definition Culpable Homicide299100
Punishment for Murder302103
Death by Negligence304A106
Simple Hurt (Punishment)323115
Grievous Hurt Definition320112
Grievous Hurt (Punishment)325117
Grievous Hurt by Weapon326118
Rape – Definition37563
Rape – Punishment37664
Sexual Harassment354A69
Stalking354D72
Theft378303
Cheating (including 420)415, 420345 & related
Sedition124AReplaced by sovereignty‑related offences (e.g., 152)

11. Revision Checklist for Judiciary Exam (BNS vs IPC)

  • Can you explain why IPC was replaced by BNS, beyond just “section numbers changed”?
  • Can you clearly distinguish between murder (BNS 103) and culpable homicide (BNS 102) with examples?
  • Can you write all 8 types of grievous hurt from memory?
  • Can you correctly answer what BNS 302 deals with (and why it is NOT murder)?
  • Do you know at least 10 important IPC → BNS conversions (e.g., 302→103, 320→112, 375→63, 376→64, 378→303)?
  • Do you understand what is truly “new” in BNS: cybercrime, organised crime, mob lynching, sovereignty offences?
  • Have you attempted at least 50 MCQs specifically on BNS sections?

If you internalise the differences and connections between IPC and BNS at the conceptual level, section numbers will automatically start making sense, and you will be far ahead of the average judiciary aspirant who is still mugging random mappings.

All the best for your judiciary exam preparation.

Disclaimer: While this guide has been prepared with utmost care, readers are advised to verify all section numbers, definitions, and legal provisions mentioned herein against the official Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 text and relevant court judgments. Laws are subject to amendments and judicial interpretations. For accurate legal advice, consult qualified legal professionals or official government sources. Judex Tutorials shall not be liable for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from reliance on this content.